Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Rudd's waffling pure pollie-speak 

Rudd's waffling pure pollie-speak

During the premiere of ABC1's Q&A program on Thursday night, an audience member challenged Kevin Rudd to justify the job losses caused by the controversial budget decision to means-test the $8000 rebate for rooftop solar power cells.

At first, Rudd stunned his assailant with a burst of trademark jibber jabber that was supposed to pass for explanation.

Then the coup de grace: "Now we must cut our cloth to make sure it fits and that applies to the totality of the budget."

Only recently did this column poke fun at Rudd's tendency to use language that either makes no sense or few people comprehend. Thursday's program - in effect a live, one-hour press conference conducted by the public - exposed to a wider audience just how brilliantly he does it.

People like Baden Eunson have been studying Rudd for a lot longer. For him, the Prime Minister is a gift.

Eunson, a writing lecturer at Monash University in Melbourne, is completing a PhD in Plain English and Jargon.

"Rudd has all these multiple personas and they keep fighting with each other," he told the Herald recently.

One of Eunson's chief criticisms of the Prime Minister is his tendency to turn a verb into a noun, thus forcing him to then find another verb to drive the new noun.

For example, rather than say "we will implement the policy next month", Rudd would say "we will be finalising the implementation of the policy next month".

Rudd is hardly alone in this category. Canberra, especially the public service, is full of wafflers. At the 2020 Summit last month, as the groups were told to wrap up their sessions, this column saw one sub-group from the governance session seriously proposing as its big idea:

"To engage the Australian community in the development of an ambitious long-term national strategic plan with accompanying benchmarks and measurable outcomes."

Meaningless rubbish that Eunson said was always going to be the end product of a summit during which many participants complained about language being diluted of all meaning. Gatherings of more than 15 people were always dangerous, he said. So the summit, with its 1000 participants, was doomed.

"Often the person who has the best idea is introverted and doesn't speak," Eunson said.

One of Eunson's favourite tools is what is known as the Flesch-Kincaid grade level formula, a program that purports to calculate how many years of formal education one needs to understand certain phrases, speeches or written texts.

It was developed in the US to help educators and parents judge the readability level of various books and texts.

Eunson said it is a crude but consistent program that basically operates by factoring in syllables, words and sentences. The more syllables there are, the harder the text is to remember.

After Rudd was in England last month and chaired the climate change session at the Progressive Governance Conference, Eunson tested the following prime ministerial offering:

"There has to be a greater synergy between, let's call it our policy leadership in this - which has been focused so much, legitimately, on targets - and global architecture almost reverse-engineered back to the means by which you can quickly deliver outcomes."

The Flesch-Kincaid program calculated that needed 18.5 years of education - that's post-doctoral - to understand.

Another speech Rudd gave on that trip - a foreign policy speech to the Brookings Institution in Washington DC - was also pilloried at the time for its overt appeal to the pointy heads.

Eunson said elements of the speech peaked at 19 in Flesch-Kincaid but averaged 10.5 - that of an intermediate high school student.

The average reading standard in Australia ranges between that of a year 8 and a year 9 student and it is this level of readability that most politicians, communicators and, indeed, newspapers, target.

"[John] Howard was as boring as batshit but there was intelligence there," Eunson said of the former prime minster's ability to mix it with the folk.

Rudd tries to do it by sprinkling his speeches with what Eunson calls "dinky-dis" and "ockerisms".

For example, in his speech to the NSW Labor conference on May 4, Rudd repeatedly used "Chif" instead of Ben Chifley, and at one stage tried to be hip by saying: "We have been in office barely five months and we've not exactly been sitting on our dig."

An example of the competing multiple personas, the public servant versus the politician, Eunson said.

Rudd, he believes, needs to dramatically improve his communications skills.

"He sounds like the head prefect reading The Man From Snowy River.

Source: smh.com.au

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
kevin rudd?? whether he is speaking mandarin or english its all double-dutch to me.
Posted by minjerriba on 26/05/2008 5:18:45 PM
This whole article is absolute garbage. Run it through your little measuring device and get back to me. Howard was not just boring, he was condescending and dangerous. We know what we voted for.
Posted by andy b on 26/05/2008 6:37:18 PM
Rudd lips his lips like a lizard as he spreads his hands out like a minister of religion preaching to a pious congregation,so easily fooled by his linguistic waffle. He promises solutions to the nation and even to the world. This will come back to bite at the next election. Governments and Prme Ministers are overwhelmed by their sense of power. Ordinary citizens carry on regardless.
Posted by dolly on 26/05/2008 8:24:21 PM
I definitely can see where this article is coming from. I too side with Mr Eunson. Most of what I've heard Mr Rudd drivel in his time so far as head of our country would have most people shrugging their heads. The usage of vagrant rhetoric throughout every single announcement, that seems to be used by every other politician sitting along side him. I've lost count of the amount of times I have managed to hear by proxy from someone like Mr Swan the same blend of s**t that Mr Rudd conjures every time he graces the Australian public/media; which also seems to be, majority of the time, quoted verbatim.
Posted by Marijan on 26/05/2008 8:33:19 PM
This needed to be said. I've spent the last 3 months delving into the archives looking for contradictions from Rudd, what I found is almost scary, not only does he lie on almost every topic, he belongs to a group, which professes to lying in order to "implement their goals through slow reform change". To a religious group, he said he was a Christian, to a Uni group, he refused to say he believed in Jesus. He said he would always be against the Death Penalty, but while running for P.M he fired a minister for an anti-death penalty speech about the bali bombings. He admitted that Iraq had WMD before the war, but later said that he didn't believe Iraq had WMD when they weren't found. While running for P.M he said he would take a tough stance against boat people, 2 weeks after becoming P.M, he began to "unwind" tough immigration policy which forced back boat people. He flew to America early last year (financed by china) and told various people including media moguls he was a "safe candidate". Rudd is a Fabian socialist, he supports them with his wallet, and gives speeches to them often, and always attends their functions. The Fabian society used to be called the "fellowship of the new life" .. whose new life? well they started the week Karl Marx died in 1883. Good luck Australia, or should I say, the peoples republic of Australia and your new front seat in aiding globalization at the U.N.
Posted by Australianstayer on 27/05/2008 5:06:48 AM
When is our Prime Minister going to make a decision and actually do something other than form a committee, a discussion group,or wait until voters threaten to unseat him from his speaking platform. Actions please Kevin 00 and stop your waffling.
Posted by John on 27/05/2008 9:29:39 AM
I agree with Eunson's observations that Kevin Rudd is struggling with the notion of the public servant vs the politician. It sounds like Rudd is trying to cover up a bad case of nerves when he talks, that's why he ends up speaking in 'Ruddles'. He seems to lack confidence, so he speaks as if he is reading straight from a government/political proganda briefing paper as he probably spent years writing them. Maybe if he just relaxed and spoke as if he was having a casual conversation he would actually sound more relaxed, confident and professional. Or maybe he thinks he sounds more impressive speaking in Ruddles and that it makes him seem more educated. Either way, he makes for an interesting study in human nature.
Posted by Starmonkey11 on 27/05/2008 11:23:32 AM
100% spin surely by the next elections people will have waken up to him (rudd ) as for the saving for a rainy day he should look out the window a lot of battlers already know that it is already raining
Posted by richard on 27/05/2008 12:10:30 PM
Well I can say I didn't vote for either Liberal, Labor, Greens, Nationals or Socialist. $200 / barrel oil is inevitable..Rudd cannot do anything to stop it. Don't blame him, Singapore or OPEC.
Posted by Ron Paul on 27/05/2008 12:32:18 PM
Perhaps the best opinion piece I've read so far in the papers- established columnists included.
Posted by moose on 27/05/2008 2:49:17 PM
1 | 2  |  next >
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
28/11/2008 | The fiendish outrage in Mumbai this week will not dent India’s resilience one bit.
Yourguide to Your Toyota
Moss Vale Motor Group 48681055
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...